Re: CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM

From: Kent Crispin (kent@SONGBIRD.COM)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 08:33:58 PST

Next message: vany@sdnp.org.pa: "Re: CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Previous message: Raúl Echeberría: "CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
In reply to: Raúl Echeberría: "CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Next in thread: vany@sdnp.org.pa: "Re: CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 11:34:58AM -0300, Raúl Echeberría wrote:
>
> I strongly propose to include "one year term" for NC representatives and
> AdCom members.
>
> I believe that the renewal of people is healthly and two years is to much
> time for internet issues.

Agree. Two years is way too long.

> Please, express your opinion about this proposal.
>
>
> I suggest to extend the time for charter discussion until 12 GMT of next
> friday.
>

Agree, as well.

-- Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain

--- You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Kent@SONGBIRD.COM To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org

Next message: vany@sdnp.org.pa: "Re: CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Previous message: Raúl Echeberría: "CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
In reply to: Raúl Echeberría: "CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Next in thread: vany@sdnp.org.pa: "Re: CHARTER - ONE YEAR TERM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:20:37 PDT