On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 06:50:00PM -0500, vany@sdnp.org.pa wrote:
> Hi to all:
>
> This is another proposal that maybe equilibrates the other three ones
> (including mine).
>
> Alternates must run together with the main representative for the Names
> Council seat in the ballot. Alternate period will be the same as main
> representative. If for any reason, an alternate has to abandon his/her
> position, then new elections for alternates should be done. If such
> alternate abandones the seat having less than 9 months in such seat,
> then AdCom will have the responsibility of elect a new alternate.
> If such alternate abandones the seat having more than 9 months,
> then the new Alternate should be elected from the members of the AdCom
> that are not Names Council member.
>
> Comentaries?
Too complicated.
-- Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain--- You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Kent@SONGBIRD.COM To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1729M@lyris.isoc.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:20:37 PDT