Dear member,
As I notified in a previous mail, I came up with a endless discussion with
Milton, with a "compromise" which seems unreachable, about the principle
of a vote for a single name or for a two-name for the adcom member
replacement.
I understand that Milton is interested by taking over KK seat in the NC,
but I stay very attached to the principle that all adcom members should be
elected from a single name ballot (except for the interim period, which
should not last longer that the required duration to organize a new
election).
I pointed out also, that Milton as a potential candidate, and myself (or
Vany) as possible candidate (as Adcom members), should not be the only
actors of the charter rewriting. When I accepted to join the charter
group (ncc-charter), I was not expecting that the difficulty would raise
from that specific election topic.
I would encourage the remaining adcom and ncc-charter members to come to a
final version which should be submitted for comments to the constituency.
I remind you that ICANN is expecting to see an adopted version of our
charter in a short delay. Not having that charter would take off
credibility of the election we must have in september. I urge you to react
promptly to that problem, preferably without the endless debate of Milton
and I.
Best regards
Dany
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
Reseau National de Telecommunications
pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
| ENSAM
Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 22 2000 - 10:27:15 PDT