Re: [ncc-charter] new words - where from?

From: Dany Vandromme (vandrome@renater.fr)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 10:28:41 PDT

  • Next message: Dany Vandromme: "Re: [ncc-charter] Re: Charter revision"

    On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Adam Peake wrote:

    > Answer my own question, sorry for the confusion.
    >
    > Dany used the original charter from the constituency foundation (August 99)
    > for amendments. I was referring to the charter Raul Echeberria sent to
    > ICANN on February 1 (or January 31st. Email to the NCC list is dated Feb.
    > 1) <http://joy.songbird.com/ncc/orignewcharter.txt>, the charter I believe
    > ICANN recognizes, correct?
    >
    > Shouldn't we be using the February 2000 version of the charter as the basis
    > for amendments?
    -
    After I made changes to the initial draft, I would prefer you point out
    the changes suggested by Raul if they are significant. I would not redo
    the changes again, otherwise I will not get it done before next week.
    Thanks
    Dany
    -
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Adam
    >
    >
    > >There are some changes in the new combined charter
    > ><http://songbird.com/ncc/ncc-charternew.txt> that seem to have come from
    > >nowhere:
    > >
    > >*Further, membership is limited to organizations that are not also
    > >*members of other DNSO constituencies. We recognize that some
    > >*organizations that are non-profit and engage in non-commercial
    > >*activities may be eligible for other DNSO constituencies, but in
    > >*order to focus the efforts of the NCDNHC, such organizations are
    > >*eligible for voting membership in the NCDNHC only if they elect not
    > >*to join other constituencies. They may, however, join the NCDNHC as
    > >*observer members.
    > >
    > >Where did "observer members" come from and why was the other wording cut?
    > >
    > >Is the inconsistency between the "observer" wording and "non-voting" in the
    > >paragraph that follows it deliberate?
    > >
    > >Perhaps I lost some email while traveling, but the last message I think
    > >sent to our group on this subject was by me on Wed,16 Aug 2000, Subject:
    > >Re: [ncc-charter] Re: charter - question and some suggested new
    > >
    > >Needless to say I disagree with the new paragraph.
    > >
    > >Thanks,
    > >
    > >Adam
    >
    >
    >

    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER

                    Reseau National de Telecommunications
             pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                      | ENSAM
    Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
    Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
    E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 29 2000 - 10:30:47 PDT