----- Original Message -----
From: "Dany Vandromme"
> Then, rather than deciding (NCC-CHARTER + eventually adcom) between option
> 1 and 2, debates went around the word "observer"
> instead of non-voting member. Then on, discussion is now about eligibility
> for NCC with respect to possible participation to other constituencies
> (and vice-versa).
Yes, this is what happened, and it was a mistake.
> Sorry to be pragmatic but it seems we should go back ASAP to the proposed
> charter, substituting only observer with non-voting member if adequate,
> and decide between option 1 or 2 (Only Vany gave her position about that),
> and then start the election process.
I agree totally.
> (Referring to previous mail, non-voting member means for me NON-VOTING. No
> point to enumerate cases where it applies: it applies to any
> decision-making process of the constituency).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 06 2000 - 07:11:33 PDT