On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 07:42:49PM +0000, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Dan Busarow wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> > > I second Bill Semich's motion that we vote this in as is. Personally I
> > > would still put in something about the duties of the POC reps, but we could
> > > always add that later if necessary.
> >
> > I agree with Antony that there should be _something_
> > about the POC reps. Maybe just a note that the number etc..
> > will be changing and that their duties will be added once
> > the changes are in place.
> >
> > Not a show stopper for me though.
>
> Voting through rules at just this point strikes me as totally
> absurd, folks ;-)
Think of it as the moral equivalent of combing your hair before going
for a job interview.
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:21 PST