On Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 09:08:00AM +0000, Jim Dixon wrote:
[...]
> The only thing that I recall having said about "smaller" gTLDs is
>
> * monopoly gTLDs are probably acceptable where the number of
> probably registrants is too small to make running a shared
> registry economically viable
The CORE SRS is designed to handle any number of TLDs; the incremental
cost of adding a TLD is zero; the incremental cost of running a
registry for a very lightly used TLD is zero. Therefore, there is no
such case as you describe -- for *any* new TLD, regardless of the number
of probable registrants, it will be cheaper to run it in the SRS than it
would be to create a tiny new monopoly registry.
-- Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:25 PST