Re: PAB elections

From: Javier SOLA (jsola@aui.es)
Date: Mon Feb 23 1998 - 23:48:45 PST


I agree.

Responding to the green paper is more important than anything else that we
could do at this time, and we should concentrate all our efforts on
responding to it.

Javier

At 23:26 23/02/98 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>
>Folks, back on Feb 5 I posted the following concerning election of a
>replacement POC observer:
>
> If there is no disagreement, nominations will open 1 week from today
> on 2359Z Feb 11, and closed on 2359Z Feb 25, when a standard two
> week election period will open.
>
>The nomination period is rapidly drawing to a close. There have been
>no nominations, and every evidence that everyone is either too busy or
>too distracted to deal with elections at this time -- certainly I have
>been far too busy dealing with the challenge the Green Paper presents
>to think much about it. Much of my effort has been spent coming up to
>speed on the real dynamics of the political process we are caught in,
>and I suspect we are all dealing with these complexities.
>
>I propose, therefore, that the election process be extended, and that
>nominations be accepted until two weeks after March 23 (the day that
>comments on the GP are due). By that time, hopefully, we will have
>both the time to think about elections, and a better idea of how
>significant they may be.
>
>--
>Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "No reason to get excited",
>kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
>PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
>http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:25 PST