Re: PAB white paper is out

From: Bob Helfant (bhelfant@globecomm.com)
Date: Mon Jun 08 1998 - 13:47:13 PDT


At 11:08 AM 6/8/98 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>Bob Helfant writes:
>> You would lead us all down the path again? Why not let IANA do its new job
>> and climb aboard when they make the new rules.
>
>Bob, I realize that you only have a financial interest here and barely
>care about the bigger issues, but some of us are interested in
>actually making sure that the results of this process are a governance
>structure for the net that we can live with.

The finacial interest is what is driving the whole ball of wax. This is
not a cult anymore.

>We spent a great deal of time, energy and money into doing more or
>less what the white paper has asked for -- having the self governance
>organs of the net come up with a reasonable organization for managing
>the DNS. Given that we have a ready-made solution available, why
>should we only allow NSI and others to beat Jon into submission when
>we can intervene and present a reasonable and well structured solution
>that has already gone through extensive industry examination?

You haven't been part of CORE so you won't be among the small group who
will be asked to finance this effort. I suggest that PAB, POC and CORE
chip in equal amounts of money to pay for the next round of lobbying and PR.

>> It would cost so much less in money and time and if history is any
>> teacher, have the same result.
>
>If you don't want in, by all means, feel free not to interfere.

I have spent much money and time with the rest of CORE all year. Thank you
for your generous invitiation not to interfere.

Bob Helfant



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:30 PST