Re: PAB nIANA facts

From: Robert F. Connelly (rconnell@psi-japan.com)
Date: Tue Jun 09 1998 - 06:45:35 PDT


At 09:37 PM 6/9/98 +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>Jeff;

Dear Ohta-San:

It would be *most appreciated* if you did not cross circulate mail. I am
among those who don't what a bunch of Jeff's postings in the closed PAB list.

Please do not include this list in the distribution list to PAB-Submit.

Regards, BobC

>
>> The current IANA is really insignificant with respect to the New
Corporation
>> that is to be formulated, regardless of what it may be called.
>
>Could you please explain why you take it granted that some new
>organization is necessary in addition to the existing
>PAB/POC/CORE/ISOC/IANA/IAB?
>
>FYI, "because the WP says so" is not an acceptable answer.
>
> Masataka Ohta
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:31 PST