> The wp leaves it to the "internet community" to come up with a new
> non-profit corporation to take over IANA. In practice that means
> that it is throwing its support behind the efforts that Jon Postel
> has already started to form such a corporation. While this is not
> the same as supporting the MoU, it is a *much* better result than the
> green paper proposal.
The problem is that USG still thinks that it can have an opinion
on DNS issues.
Worse, major problms of a GP, such as US-based incorporation
and lack of understanding on trademark issues, remains same.
The only change, it seems to me, is in wording that it is now
less obvious that USG is acting for the benefit of NSI.
Masataka Ohta