Re: PAB white paper is out
Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Fri, 05 Jun 1998 19:29:51 -0400
Dave Crocker writes:
> At 11:50 AM 6/5/98 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >I think so, too. The white paper really seems to be a significant
> >retreat on the part of the USG.
>
> Except for the fact that it causes yet-more delay before new tlds and
> registars get under way, and that means even more windfall revenue for NSI.
The entire situation makes me want to vomit. Essentially, the
government is now saying that what we did in the first place (convene
a committee of community representatives) was the right idea, but
completely without acknowledging that we ALREADY went through the
process.
Perry