Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries

From: Bob Helfant (bhelfant@globecomm.com)
Date: Fri Feb 27 1998 - 08:21:05 PST

Next message: Javier SOLA: "Re: PAB The Multiple Monopoly Approach"
Previous message: Patrik Fältström: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Sascha Ignjatovic: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Dave Crocker: "Official PAB position on competing registry administration authorities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 05:41 PM 2/26/98 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>How is CORE no competition? Seems like a competitive system to me.
>
>Perry

How can one company proposing to control all TLDs be considered
competitive. It is another version (albeit more international) of NSI.

Bob

Next message: Javier SOLA: "Re: PAB The Multiple Monopoly Approach"
Previous message: Patrik Fältström: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Sascha Ignjatovic: "Re: PAB The Green Paper and competing registries"
Reply: Dave Crocker: "Official PAB position on competing registry administration authorities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:26 PST