Re: PAB Proposal for support of IANA.

From: William Allen Simpson (wsimpson@greendragon.com)
Date: Mon Aug 31 1998 - 13:47:58 PDT


> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 01:56:00 -0700
> significant power would be a much jucier target than PAB, and
                                      juicier
> implementation of such an organization must proceed very cautiously.
>
I am not convinced that any membership organization would be acceptable
to the dissenters, and certainly not PAB. Originally, it was to have
been ISoc. But maybe we can come up with a new iteration of the MoU.
Whether or not it has a membership fee, I would expect _some_ legal
document to bind the members.

Please put some text in opposing direct membership with proxies (rather
than a User/Industry Supporting organization).

Anyway, I got the IETF plenary to give a standing ovation to the draft
IANA plan.... We have momentum going!

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:35 PST