>we should definitely orientate our self on poc this means we need some
>information going from poc to pab -mr javier sola is i am shure working
>hard to suport poc to do the nechst step but until now we have not heard
>ANYTHING from him altough he represents the pab in the poc
Having been on the POC list for a couple of months and listened to three
conference calls, I think I can safely say that there is nothing I can
report either.
This is because:-
a) We are observers, so we watch and listen, rather than part of decision
making process
b) I have not seen any decision making on the list or conference calls
These forums seem limited to discussions and a way of reflecting personal
comments. If any decisions are being made, they are occuring elsewhere.
>either there wuld be soon a first official statement of the poc or
>we should request mr.mott and mr.sola to report to us what is going on in
>poc discussion list or whan we can expect a "orientation statement"
>this is very importend
There has been no traffic on the POC list about the USG green paper. There
has been some discussion regarding 'round robin' policy for CORE registry.
Nothing else.
There does seem to be a 24 hour delay on message reception at times, so
maybe there is some stuff going on now, but from where I sit, POC has not
yet reacted to USG.
Read 2Day's World Domain News at http://www.2day.net.nz/news/ to hear what
individuals are being reported as saying in the media.
> Thus it is very important to try to cause changes to the GP -- it is a
> public document, open for comment, and, in theory, open to change.
What would you like to change?
regards
Peter Mott
Chief Enthusiast
2Day Internet Limited.
--------------------------------------------
gTLD-MoU Policy Oversight Committee observer