Dear Perry:
Thank you for your posting, there are, indeed, some who don't see the big
picture. Domain names are *really* only a small fraction of the total issue.
Regards,
BobC
P.S. I have now read your follow on dialog with BobH. It is clear that
BobH sees only a small fraction of the domain name part of the issue, which
is only a small part of the whole issue. Please understand that BobH is
not representative of the majority of CORE. The majority of CORE have
rejected his positions when put to a vote, both in *live* Plenary meetings,
Teleconferences and VoteBots. Please don't "tar all of us with the same
stick" you use on BobH;-{
>
>We spent a great deal of time, energy and money into doing more or
>less what the white paper has asked for -- having the self governance
>organs of the net come up with a reasonable organization for managing
>the DNS. Given that we have a ready-made solution available, why
>should we only allow NSI and others to beat Jon into submission when
>we can intervene and present a reasonable and well structured solution
>that has already gone through extensive industry examination?
>
>> It would cost so much less in money and time and if history is any
>> teacher, have the same result.
>
>If you don't want in, by all means, feel free not to interfere.
>
>Perry
>