I fully agree with John.
Javier
At 16:32 13/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Kent,
>
>FWIW at this late hour...
>
>I think the PAB should say something. The alternative is
>to join the ranks of groups that can't agree on anything
>and are hence doomed to be completely ineffectual in this
>arena. I think your note is a very good example of
>"something", and is consistent with a long series of
>general PAB positions. And, perhaps like Bill, I see some
>worthwhile ideas in some of the alternate proposals and
>suggestions, but they are things I'd like brought to the
>early attention of the new board rather than things I find
>"compelling" (the latter often has the semantics of
>"important enough to hold things up while we try to resolve
>or fix", and I don't think that is the case.
>
>So, as far as I'm concerned (mostly as an individual --
>this note has not been reviewed within MCI WorldCom), ship
>it. Don't let a quibble about a phrase commenting on
>proposals we are not endorsing turn into a roadblock.
>
> john
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 03:22:36 PST